这篇文章主要介绍了浅谈MySQL中的子查询优化技巧,子查询的优化是MySQL诸多优化方法中的基本,需要的朋友可以参考下
mysql的子查询的优化一直不是很友好,一直有受业界批评比较多,也是我在sql优化中遇到过最多的问题之一,你可以点击这里 ,这里来获得一些信息,mysql在处理子查询的时候,会将子查询改写,通常情况下,我们希望由内到外,也就是先完成子查询的结果,然后在用子查询来驱动外查询的表,完成查询,但是恰恰相反,子查询不会先被执行;今天希望通过介绍一些实际的案例来加深对mysql子查询的理解:
案例:用户反馈数据库响应较慢,许多业务动更新被卡住;登录到数据库中观察,发现长时间执行的sql;
- | 10437 | usr0321t9m9 | 10.242.232.50:51201 | oms | Execute | 1179 | Sending
Sql为:
- select tradedto0_.* from a1 tradedto0_ where tradedto0_.tradestatus='1'
- and (tradedto0_.tradeoid in (select orderdto1_.tradeoid from a2 orderdto1_ where
- orderdto1_.proname like '%??%' or orderdto1_.procode like '%??%')) and tradedto0_.undefine4='1'
- and tradedto0_.invoicetype='1' and tradedto0_.tradestep='0' and (tradedto0_.orderCompany like '0002%') order by tradedto0_.tradesign ASC, tradedto0_.makertime desc limit 15;
2.其他表的更新被阻塞:
- update a1 set tradesign='DAB67634-795C-4EAC-B4A0-78F0D531D62F',
- markColor=' #CD5555', memotime='2012-09- 22', markPerson='??' where tradeoid in ('gy2012092204495100032') ;
为了尽快恢复应用,将其长时间执行的sql kill掉后,应用恢复正常;
3.分析执行计划:
- db@3306 :explain select tradedto0_.* from a1 tradedto0_ where tradedto0_.tradestatus='1' and (tradedto0_.tradeoid in (select orderdto1_.tradeoid
- from a2 orderdto1_ where orderdto1_.proname like '%??%' or orderdto1_.procode like '%??%')) and tradedto0_.undefine4='1' and tradedto0_.invoicetype='1' and tradedto0_.tradestep='0' and (tradedto0_.orderCompany like '0002%') order by tradedto0_.tradesign ASC, tradedto0_.makertime desc limit 15;
- +----+--------------------+------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+-------+-----
- | id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
- +----+--------------------+------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+-------+-----
- | 1 | PRIMARY | tradedto0_ | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 27454 | Using where; Using filesort |
- | 2 | DEPENDENT SUBQUERY | orderdto1_ | ALL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | 40998 | Using where |
- +----+--------------------+------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+-------+-----
从执行计划上,我们开始一步一步地进行优化:
首先,我们看看执行计划的第二行,也就是子查询的那部分,orderdto1_进行了全表的扫描,我们看看能不能添加适当的索引:
A.使用覆盖索引:
- db@3306:alter table a2 add index ind_a2(proname,procode,tradeoid);
- ERROR 1071 (42000): Specified key was too long; max key length is 1000 bytes
添加组合索引超过了最大key length限制:
B.查看该表的字段定义:
- db@3306 :DESC a2 ;
- +---------------------+---------------+------+-----+---------+-------+
- | FIELD | TYPE | NULL | KEY | DEFAULT | Extra |
- +---------------------+---------------+------+-----+---------+-------+
- | OID | VARCHAR(50) | NO | PRI | NULL | |
- | TRADEOID | VARCHAR(50) | YES | | NULL | |
- | PROCODE | VARCHAR(50) | YES | | NULL | |
- | PRONAME | VARCHAR(1000) | YES | | NULL | |
- | SPCTNCODE | VARCHAR(200) | YES | | NULL | |
C.查看表字段的平均长度:
- db@3306 :SELECT MAX(LENGTH(PRONAME)),avg(LENGTH(PRONAME)) FROM a2;
- +----------------------+----------------------+
- | MAX(LENGTH(PRONAME)) | avg(LENGTH(PRONAME)) |
- +----------------------+----------------------+
- | 95 | 24.5588 |
D.缩小字段长度
- ALTER TABLE MODIFY COLUMN PRONAME VARCHAR(156);
再进行执行计划分析:
- db@3306 :explain select tradedto0_.* from a1 tradedto0_ where tradedto0_.tradestatus='1' and (tradedto0_.tradeoid in (select orderdto1_.tradeoid from a2 orderdto1_ where orderdto1_.proname like '%??%' or orderdto1_.procode like '%??%')) and tradedto0_.undefine4='1' and tradedto0_.invoicetype='1' and tradedto0_.tradestep='0' and (tradedto0_.orderCompany like '0002%') order by tradedto0_.tradesign ASC, tradedto0_.makertime desc limit 15;
- +----+--------------------+------------+-------+-----------------+----------------------+---------+
- | id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
- +----+--------------------+------------+-------+-----------------+----------------------+---------+
- | 1 | PRIMARY | tradedto0_ | ref | ind_tradestatus | ind_tradestatus | 345 | const,const,const,const | 8962 | Using where; Using filesort |
- | 2 | DEPENDENT SUBQUERY | orderdto1_ | index | NULL | ind_a2 | 777 | NULL | 41005 | Using where; Using index |
- +----+--------------------+------------+-------+-----------------+----------------------+---------+
发现性能还是上不去,关键在两个表扫描的行数并没有减小(8962*41005),上面添加的索引没有太大的效果,现在查看t表的执行结果:
- db@3306 :select orderdto1_.tradeoid from t orderdto1_ where orderdto1_.proname like '%??%' or orderdto1_.procode like '%??%';
- Empty set (0.05 sec)
结果集为空,所以需要将t表的结果集做作为驱动表;
4.通过上面测试验证,普通的mysql子查询写法性能上是很差的,为mysql的子查询天然的弱点,需要将sql进行改写为关联的写法:
- select tradedto0_.* from a1 tradedto0_ ,(select orderdto1_.tradeoid from a2 orderdto1_ where orderdto1_.proname like '%??%' or orderdto1_.procode like '%??%')t2 where tradedto0_.tradestatus='1' and (tradedto0_.tradeoid=t2.tradeoid ) and tradedto0_.undefine4='1' and tradedto0_.invoicetype='1' and tradedto0_.tradestep='0' and (tradedto0_.orderCompany like '0002%') order by tradedto0_.tradesign ASC, tradedto0_.makertime desc limit 15;
5.查看执行计划:
- db@3306 :explain select tradedto0_.* from a1 tradedto0_ ,(select orderdto1_.tradeoid from a2 orderdto1_ where orderdto1_.proname like '%??%' or orderdto1_.procode like '%??%')t2 where tradedto0_.tradestatus='1' and (tradedto0_.tradeoid=t2.tradeoid ) and tradedto0_.undefine4='1' and tradedto0_.invoicetype='1' and tradedto0_.tradestep='0' and (tradedto0_.orderCompany like '0002%') order by tradedto0_.tradesign ASC, tradedto0_.makertime desc limit 15;
- +----+-------------+------------+-------+---------------+----------------------+---------+------+
- | id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
- +----+-------------+------------+-------+---------------+----------------------+---------+------+
- | 1 | PRIMARY | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | Impossible WHERE noticed after reading const tables |
- | 2 | DERIVED | orderdto1_ | index | NULL | ind_a2 | 777 | NULL | 41005 | Using where; Using index |
- +----+-------------+------------+-------+---------------+----------------------+---------+------+
6.执行时间:
- db@3306 :select tradedto0_.* from a1 tradedto0_ ,(select orderdto1_.tradeoid from a2 orderdto1_ where orderdto1_.proname like '%??%' or orderdto1_.procode like '%??%')t2 where tradedto0_.tradestatus='1' and (tradedto0_.tradeoid=t2.tradeoid ) and tradedto0_.undefine4='1' and tradedto0_.invoicetype='1' and tradedto0_.tradestep='0' and (tradedto0_.orderCompany like '0002%') order by tradedto0_.tradesign ASC, tradedto0_.makertime desc limit 15;
- Empty set (0.03 sec)
缩短到了毫秒;
新闻热点
疑难解答