最近在网上看到了一些测试,感觉不是很准确,今天亲自测试了一番。得出了结论,测试过程在个人计算机上,可能不够全面,仅供参考。
测试过程:
准备一张测试表
CREATE TABLE `test_test` ( `id` int(11) NOT NULL auto_increment, `num` int(11) NOT NULL default '0', PRIMARY KEY (`id`) ) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 AUTO_INCREMENT=1 ; |
建个储存过程向表中插入10W条数据
create procedure p_test(pa int(11)) begin declare max_num int(11) default 100000; declare i int default 0; declare rand_num int; select count(id) into max_num from test_test; while i < pa do if max_num < 100000 then select cast(rand()*100 as unsigned) into rand_num; insert into test_test(num)values(rand_num); end if; set i = i +1; end while; end |
调用存储过程插入数据
call p_test(100000); |
开始测试:(不加索引)
select distinct num from test_test; select num from test_test group by num; [SQL] select distinct num from test_test; 受影响的行: 0 时间: 0.078ms [SQL] select num from test_test group by num; 受影响的行: 0 时间: 0.031ms |
二、num字段上创建索引
ALTER TABLE `test_test` ADD INDEX `num_index` (`num`) ; |
再次查询
select distinct num from test_test; select num from test_test group by num; [SQL] select distinct num from test_test; 受影响的行: 0 时间: 0.000ms [SQL] select num from test_test group by num; 受影响的行: 0 时间: 0.000ms |
这时候我们发现时间太小了 0.000秒都无法精确了。
我们转到命令行下测试
mysql> set profiling=1; mysql> select distinct(num) from test_test; mysql> select num from test_test group by num; mysql> show profiles; +----------+------------+----------------------------------------+ | Query_ID | Duration | Query | +----------+------------+----------------------------------------+ | 1 | 0.00072550 | select distinct(num) from test_test | | 2 | 0.00071650 | select num from test_test group by num | +----------+------------+----------------------------------------+ |
分析:
新闻热点
疑难解答